Professional accountability

Judge reviews.

Select any state, identify the judge or judicial officer, and submit a factual review of your firsthand experience. Reviews are moderated before publication.

Ratings 1 is lowest; 5 is highest

Published methodology

Judicial review criteria

01

Neutrality toward the parties

02

Courtroom demeanor

03

Opportunity for each side to present evidence

04

Consistency in evidentiary rulings

05

Clarity of explanations

06

Apparent preparedness

07

Treatment of self-represented litigants

08

Management of the proceeding

09

Correspondence between findings and evidence