North Dakota · Custody—Parents Never Married

North Dakota
Jury Instructions.

Instructions for parents who were never married, focused on custody, parenting arrangements, and child support.

Educational draft—confirm current law before live use

The custody worksheet below identifies the researched North Dakota best-interest authorities and requires a finding on every listed factor. Child-support, property, local-rule, and case-specific instructions still require current professional review.

← Choose another state
Divorce—with childrenDivorce—without childrenParents never married

Interactive North Dakota worksheet

Custody decision map

0/13factors completed
Educational worksheet—not a verdict or legal advice. Apply the complete current law and case record. Domestic violence may control the analysis through a statutory presumption and is never reduced to a point score.

Step 1. Make a finding on every best-interest factor.

Select whom each factor favors, then state the evidence and reasoning. “Not applicable” still requires an explanation.

a
Factor 1 of 13

Emotional ties and parenting ability

The love, affection, and emotional ties between each parent and child, and each parent’s ability to provide nurture, love, affection, and guidance.

Who does this factor favor?
b
Factor 2 of 13

Basic care and a safe environment

Each parent’s ability to assure adequate food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and a safe environment.

Who does this factor favor?
c
Factor 3 of 13

Developmental needs

The child’s developmental needs and each parent’s ability to meet those needs now and in the future.

Who does this factor favor?
d
Factor 4 of 13

Stability and continuity

The sufficiency and stability of each home, the impact of extended family, the length of time the child has lived in each home, and the desirability of continuity in home and community.

Who does this factor favor?
e
Factor 5 of 13

Relationship with the other parent

Each parent’s willingness and ability to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the other parent and child.

Who does this factor favor?
f
Factor 6 of 13

Moral fitness

The moral fitness of each parent, but only as it affects the child.

Who does this factor favor?
g
Factor 7 of 13

Mental and physical health

The mental and physical health of each parent, but only as it affects the child.

Who does this factor favor?
h
Factor 8 of 13

Home, school, and community record

The child’s record in the home, school, and community and the potential effect of a change.

Who does this factor favor?
i
Factor 9 of 13

Mature child’s preference

The reasonable preference of a child shown by clear and convincing evidence to have sufficient maturity, including whether improper influence affected that preference.

Who does this factor favor?
j
Factor 10 of 13

Domestic violence

Evidence of domestic violence. North Dakota law may create a rebuttable presumption in specified circumstances, so this factor cannot be treated as an ordinary point in a tally.

Safety checkpointIf the statutory presumption may apply, stop ordinary balancing and follow North Dakota’s required domestic-violence analysis.
Who does this factor favor?
k
Factor 11 of 13

Other people in the household

The child’s interaction with anyone who resides in, is present in, or frequently visits a parent’s household, including any history or tendency to harm others.

Who does this factor favor?
l
Factor 12 of 13

Bad-faith false allegations

False allegations, not made in good faith, by one parent against the other of harm to the child.

Who does this factor favor?
m
Factor 13 of 13

Other relevant considerations

Any other factor the decision-maker finds relevant to the custody decision.

Who does this factor favor?

13 factors still need a selection and explanation.

Legal source: North Dakota Century Code §§ 14-09-06.2, 14-09-29, 14-09-30, and 14-09-31. Confirm that the law is current before use in any live matter.

Auto-populated verdict document

North Dakota parenting-plan builder

Make each finding below. The draft plan updates automatically using North Dakota terminology. Review every provision against current law and the child’s circumstances.

Original educational drafting tool. This is not Samantha Boss material, an official court form, or legal advice. A safety restriction requires the findings and procedures mandated by controlling law.
Children and existing arrangement
Core custody findings
Transitions and calendar
Distance-based school-year and summer schedule

The recommendation changes automatically as the travel and school inputs change. Jurors must still explain why the result serves this child’s best interests.

Calculated recommendation

The homes are close enough for regular school-week transitions. Use the selected regular schedule, including weekday time when consistent with school attendance. Summer generally continues that schedule, with up to two uninterrupted vacation weeks for each parent.

Transportation findings
Communication and care
Conflict-prevention provisions
Safety findings
Domestic violence and child safety — N.D.C.C. §§ 14-09-06.2, 14-05-22

A qualifying domestic-violence finding triggers a rebuttable presumption against specified custody or residential arrangements.

Built-in child-support calculator

North Dakota presumptive guideline amount.

Jurors make each factual finding below. The calculation then applies the cited state rules and shows every material step.

Versioned legal model: N.D. Admin. Code ch. 75-02-04.1 effective July 1, 2023; current official schedule. Exceptions, disputed income, imputation, deviations, and unusual family structures require the additional findings flagged below.

1. Residential-responsibility findings

2. Parent A monthly gross-income findings

Use annualized income divided by twelve. Self-employment income ordinarily uses the required multi-year averaging rules.

3. Parent B monthly gross-income findings

Use annualized income divided by twelve. Self-employment income ordinarily uses the required multi-year averaging rules.

4. Parent A permitted monthly deductions

Enter the hypothetical tax and other deduction amounts determined under § 75-02-04.1-01(6). State tax is generally 11% of the hypothetical federal obligation.

5. Parent B permitted monthly deductions

Enter the hypothetical tax and other deduction amounts determined under § 75-02-04.1-01(6). State tax is generally 11% of the hypothetical federal obligation.

6. Parent A other-family, parenting-time, and benefit findings

For other obligees, enter the total hypothetical guideline obligations calculated before multiple-family averaging. Enter overnights separately for each child; only a court-ordered schedule over 100 nights for that child receives the statutory adjustment.

7. Parent B other-family, parenting-time, and benefit findings

For other obligees, enter the total hypothetical guideline obligations calculated before multiple-family averaging. Enter overnights separately for each child; only a court-ordered schedule over 100 nights for that child receives the statutory adjustment.

8. Deviation and additional-expense findings

North Dakota’s base formula does not automatically add childcare, school activities, or similar expenses. The court may apportion specific expenses in addition to equal-responsibility support or deviate only under the listed rule criteria.

Calculated presumptive obligation

Parent B pays$590.00/month

Parent A monthly net incomeGross income $4000.00 less $0.00 permitted deductions.$4000.00

Parent B monthly net incomeGross income $3000.00 less $0.00 permitted deductions.$3000.00

Parent A guideline obligationOfficial schedule after applicable multiple-family and parenting-time rules.$748.00

Parent B guideline obligationOfficial schedule after applicable multiple-family and parenting-time rules.$590.00

Final monthly obligationObligor-only schedule after any multiple-family average, extended-parenting-time adjustment, and derivative-benefit credit.$590.00

Authority: N.D. Admin. Code §§ 75-02-04.1-01 through -10 and N.D.C.C. § 14-09-09.7 · N.D. Admin. Code ch. 75-02-04.1 effective July 1, 2023; current official schedule

Resolve every warning and confirm the findings before printing.

Instruction modules

Two central decisions.

Jurors complete the applicable modules independently before deliberation. Every material conclusion must identify the evidence and legal standard relied upon.

02

Custody & parenting

Apply every required best-interest factor and produce a complete, workable parenting plan when children are involved.

  1. Address each statutory best-interest factor
  2. Determine legal custody or decision-making
  3. Set the regular residential schedule
  4. Allocate holidays, school breaks, and transportation
  5. Address communication, exchanges, and information sharing
  6. State the evidence supporting each material finding
North Dakota authority is listed in the factor worksheet aboveStatutes · court rules · official worksheets · controlling decisions · definitions
03

Child support

Determine the supported factual inputs before applying the state’s current child-support calculation.

  1. Determine each parent’s income under state law
  2. Resolve parenting-time inputs
  3. Address health insurance and unreimbursed expenses
  4. Address childcare and permitted adjustments
  5. Apply the current state formula
  6. Explain any legally permitted deviation
Additional North Dakota authorities to be insertedStatutes · court rules · official worksheets · controlling decisions · definitions

Required case-specific attachments

Every final instruction packet should include:

01Verified current state authorities

02Definitions used in the jurisdiction

03Complete factor-by-factor verdict forms

04Current support worksheet or calculator output

05Case-specific stipulated and disputed facts

06Effective date and legal-review notation